RedDragon86 Posted December 11, 2018 Report Share Posted December 11, 2018 On 10/1/2018 at 6:43 PM, Tom said: The problem with this episode was that too many people fudged around on the script, around a dozen participating writers including Michael Mann himself were part of the story process of this first produced episode of season 4. The original storyline about TV preachers and their behaviour was well selected and a hot topic at the time. This episode started great but jumped the shark exactly at the point where Faynell tries to doctor a rape by Tubbs on live video. Not only that this is the start of a very constructed subplot (not Proverb turns out to have been framing Tubbs but someone else is indirectly via manipulating Proverb‘s staff against Tubbs) that will dominate the rest of the episode and prevent logic and action, but it is also completely unrealistic. As they had the alleged Faynell rape on tape it could easily be seen that SHE started grabbing Tubbs not vice versa. He had his hands hanging down for some time while she yelled and pushed herself onto him before he started to grab her to keep her on distance. No way that any detective or prosecutor could have overlooked that bogus allegation. Whoever of the dozen co-writers came up with this reasoning of the investigation against Tubbs, spoiled the ep as it went downhill from there and running from one crazy idea into the next (e.g. Mason Mather exactly passing out at the time of the attack against Proverb and then suddenly waking up is another unbelievable plot element) until it passed out. My verdict: first 20 minutes full 5 Stars, the rest 1-2 out of 5. I thought Michael Mann left the show after S2, John Schulian was the writer wasn't he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt5 Posted December 11, 2018 Report Share Posted December 11, 2018 3 hours ago, RedDragon86 said: I thought Michael Mann left the show after S2, John Schulian was the writer wasn't he? Yes John Schulian wrote this episode and was a writer in Season 3 also. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted December 12, 2018 Report Share Posted December 12, 2018 vor 14 Stunden schrieb RedDragon86: I thought Michael Mann left the show after S2, John Schulian was the writer wasn't he? Mann did not fully leave. He was not actively involved anymore most of the time after handing over to Wolf and Richard Brams. But in this specific episode he was one of the „participating writers“ as stated on the history page of the original script. Schulian wrote the original script thus he was credited in the episode and the script was registered under his name. The other 10 people working over Schulians script (participating writers and script revisions) were not credited in the episode but on script history only. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rattlehead Posted April 12, 2019 Report Share Posted April 12, 2019 I like this episode, great subject to tackle. Brian Dennehy is a treat to watch. I feel the ending is a cop-out, like they didn't know what to do. What's with DJ's wardrobe in this episode? It starts off great with one of the best jackets in the series but then it looks more like PJs than a casual chic outfit (as my friend likes to call the style.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbie C. Posted April 12, 2019 Report Share Posted April 12, 2019 I happen to like this episode as well, and I think it's another one that fell victim to tap-dancing around potentially controversial issues. Televangelism was really hitting the big time in the '80s, and this episode is a decent commentary on how quite a bit of it looked at the time. The ending I think spoke more to the idea that people are gullible, and so long as there's a pitch there will be someone to fall for it. With that many writers involved it's hard to say if this was the original ending, one added by someone else, or a strange compromise ending based on a couple different versions. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bren10 Posted April 12, 2019 Report Share Posted April 12, 2019 I definitely think that more could have been done with Tubbs being falsely accused of attempted rape/sexual assault. Maybe even its own episode. It was certainly sidestepped here. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedDragon86 Posted September 4, 2019 Report Share Posted September 4, 2019 (edited) For being such a great actor, Brian Dennehy was wasted in this silly episode. For all his talents as an actor he should have been in a more serious role, maybe the prison warden in "Walk Alone" Edited September 4, 2019 by RedDragon86 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bren10 Posted September 4, 2019 Report Share Posted September 4, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, RedDragon86 said: For being such a great actor, Brian Dennehy was wasted in this silly episode. For all his talents as an actor he should have been in a more serious role, maybe the prison warden in "Walk Alone" Well it does take some talent to pull off those preaching monologues, even if you think the role isn't very good. They needed somebody with charisma and gravitas and Dennehy had that. In the hands of some other actors the ep could've been unwatchable. I keep thinking Weird Al Yankovic or something which could've been terrible. Edited September 4, 2019 by Bren10 Spelling 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedDragon86 Posted September 4, 2019 Report Share Posted September 4, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Bren10 said: Well it does take some talent to pull off those preaching monologues, even if you think the role isn't very good. They needed somebody with charisma and gravitas and Dennehy had that. In the hands of some other actors the ep could've been unwatchable. I keep thinking Weird Al Yankovic or something which could've been terrible. What I am really getting is you don't look back at Brian Dennehy time in Miami Vice in way to be admired or respected like Dennis Farina, Gordon Liddy or Guy Boyd because his episode was half-baked, his role was lets be honest ridiculous. He did pull it off well but the key point I am making is he deserved a more mature, intelligent episode, one to be remembered because he is a great, well respected actor. Edited September 4, 2019 by RedDragon86 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dadrian Posted September 4, 2019 Report Share Posted September 4, 2019 4 hours ago, RedDragon86 said: maybe the prison warden in "Walk Alone" Would have been a lot more work for the prisoners at the end! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbie C. Posted September 4, 2019 Report Share Posted September 4, 2019 1 hour ago, Bren10 said: Well it does take some talent to pull off those preaching monologues, even if you think the role isn't very good. They needed somebody with charisma and gravitas and Dennehy had that. In the hands of some other actors the ep could've been unwatchable. I keep thinking Weird Al Yankovic or something which could've been terrible. I think too many people don’t quite ‘get’ how many scandals were rocking that community when this episode came out. Casting BD in that role (and let’s also remember no one forced him to take it) gave it weight as you point out. This is one of the ‘of its time’ episodes that simply doesn’t track well without the context. I actually enjoy it and think BD took a risk mocking the Jim Bakers of the world when he did this. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bren10 Posted September 4, 2019 Report Share Posted September 4, 2019 (edited) You also have to take into account what Dennehy himself wanted to play. He would've had a little more clout than the average guest star even then in '87. He'd already worked for Mann on Jericho Mile as well. Maybe he didn't want to be a prison warden. He'd already done that sort of thing and this was a chance to be a little different, as well as topical, like Robbie indicated. Edited September 4, 2019 by Bren10 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedDragon86 Posted September 5, 2019 Report Share Posted September 5, 2019 22 hours ago, Robbie C. said: I think too many people don’t quite ‘get’ how many scandals were rocking that community when this episode came out. Casting BD in that role (and let’s also remember no one forced him to take it) gave it weight as you point out. This is one of the ‘of its time’ episodes that simply doesn’t track well without the context. I actually enjoy it and think BD took a risk mocking the Jim Bakers of the world when he did this. But was the right material for MV though? It was better when they were tackling "The Contras" and the drugs coming in from Thailand instead of eccentric preachers and UFO's we seen in S4. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbie C. Posted September 5, 2019 Report Share Posted September 5, 2019 Many of the preacher scandals tied back to drugs and the like, so I’d say it fit in the context of the times. As for Missing Hours...maybe it was an X-Files prequel. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dadrian Posted September 5, 2019 Report Share Posted September 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Robbie C. said: As for Missing Hours...maybe it was an X-Files prequel. Naw...X-Files was a great show. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicefan7777 Posted September 6, 2019 Report Share Posted September 6, 2019 13 hours ago, Dadrian said: Naw...X-Files was a great show. One of my all time favorite series. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt5 Posted September 6, 2019 Report Share Posted September 6, 2019 4 hours ago, Vicefan7777 said: One of my all time favorite series. Very good indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewRemington Posted July 22, 2020 Report Share Posted July 22, 2020 (edited) This is one episode that’s grown on me. I never hated it, but it is a pretty good and fun episode. I really like the beginning with Proverb’s speech and the drug sting. Rico was pretty cool with that hat. I don’t know what kind of weirdo pills he had in that bag, though. My biggest gripe is: If Mason Mather was behind the phony-rape scenario, then why did Faye Nell accuse Rico of attempted assault? Was she also brainwashed by Mather? That whole rape-scenario thing just doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. I thought Mather just wanted revenge on Proverb? Confusing. I’ll be honest, I have ADHD and sometimes even if I’ve seen something 5+ times, I still don’t catch all the plot details. My mind is all over the place. Anyway, that plot just seems like when you have to take a detour on some really crappy roads and get stuck in the mud... Yikes! But it may all be worth it just for that hilarious Crockett line about Rico’s libido getting “critical” or something like that. Overall, it’s still a classic, enjoyable Vice episode. Edited July 22, 2020 by AndrewRemington 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdiegolo78 Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 Best part of this episode for me was the Reverend Proverb's monologue during the intro, played by the late Brian Dennehy. Then a few lines here and there, the rest is just meh! I'll give it a 4. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdiegolo78 Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 On 9/5/2019 at 5:42 PM, RedDragon86 said: But was the right material for MV though? It was better when they were tackling "The Contras" and the drugs coming in from Thailand instead of eccentric preachers and UFO's we seen in S4 Anything became possible in S4 ...hardly surprising! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdiegolo78 Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 On 12/11/2018 at 7:35 PM, RedDragon86 said: I thought Michael Mann left the show after S2, John Schulian was the writer wasn't he? Micheal Mann stayed as executive producer till the end. In S1 he was fully involved in the show, then during the S2 run he was working on other projects as well (Man hunter). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Ferrariman Posted February 18, 2021 Author Administrators Report Share Posted February 18, 2021 Call me crazy but I love this episode. Bill Bob's preaching at the beginning is a classic, a TV minister telling you he's stealing your money! Some good cues too. I love the music in the teaser when Leona is making a drug buy from Rico. I also love the music when Rico is chasing Carl Becker up to the roof. Dadrian already covered that one! 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbie C. Posted February 18, 2021 Report Share Posted February 18, 2021 I've always enjoyed this one as well. Very topical for the times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Vigilante Posted February 18, 2021 Report Share Posted February 18, 2021 I always think "Pink" regarding this episode! I've enjoyed it more over the years. Reminds me of guys like Robert Tilton. How anyone took guys like this serious is a head-scratcher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fakespyder Posted February 18, 2021 Report Share Posted February 18, 2021 (edited) This is probably one of the more watchable silly episodes. DJ and PMT really get to stretch their comic timing and it works pretty well. But this isnt what I watch MV for. I watch MV to see cops v dealers, undercover conficts, the glamor mixed with the danger. This episode is one of those that is too far removed from any of that for me to really like it, despite great acting from all concerned. Edited February 18, 2021 by fakespyder 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.